Lamis Find articles by Dorian A. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.
On the evening of Elizabeth's death six years later, the streets of London were lit by festive bonfires and punctuated by cries of "We have a king! Rather than a seamless transition of power reminding all the populace that the corporate body of the monarch was immortal, unchanging, and unaltered by the demise of a particular sovereign, the death of Elizabeth marked a breach in the body politic as much as a continuation of it, and one that could be figured, at least by some, as a welcome discontinuity.
How Bereavement has Affected Jerzy Essay Words | 4 Pages. How Bereavement has Affected Jerzy The death of a spouse has to be one of the most stressful changes you will ever experience. We will write a custom essay sample on Loss and grief specifically for you for only $ $/page. A persons thoughts would have to change from what they normally take for granted in order to cope with what has changed. Cruse Bereavement Care Scotland offers support after bereavement and also offers information, support and. Essays and criticism on William Shakespeare's Hamlet - Mourning and Misogyny: Hamlet, The Revenger's Tragedy, and the Final Progress of Elizabeth I,
The queen is dead—long live the king. There were extensive and How bereavement has affected jerzy essay eulogies, to be sure, heartfelt expressions of grief over the passing of Elizabeth, but during the last years of her reign the "political misogynism of the early years"3 had also resurfaced strongly throughout her court and beyond its confines.
It would not take many years of Jacobean rule to complicate the desire for a male sovereign, of course. As Christopher Haigh has noted, an idealized portrait of Elizabeth as a shrewd ruler and capable strategist emerged gradually over the first decade of James's reign, oftentimes in the form of a "coded commentary" on the defects of that reign.
It is this process of accommodation and revision, marked as it is by an uncertain economy between mourning and misogyny, that I wish to examine here; I am interested not only in How bereavement has affected jerzy essay herself but also in the complex and ambivalent affective process that her death allows us to glimpse—a process that might be called mourning under the sign of patriarchy.
Indeed, the possibility I wish to entertain is that, for the Renaissance, male mourning is sometimes difficult to dissociate from misogyny: Human emotions are no more free from historical and cultural construction than are genders or ideologies or gestures; that is to say, emotions and other forms of human affect have a history, or rather histories, since the differences traced by cultural historians, historical psychologists, and anthropologists must be charted along specific cultural, regional, communal, and geopolitical axes as well as temporal ones.
But we do not and, in this instance, can never know what emotions were thereby expressed: Misogyny presents an interpretive embarrassment of riches: Private personal diaries, in which one would expect to find subjective emotional responses recorded, are themselves rare in the period; the expressions of individual grief which do exist can easily strike the modern reader as remote and unfeeling, leading even so astute a student of the past as Lawrence Stone to confuse historical and cultural difference with absence and to declare that major bereavements were not felt as such in the period, since "in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries interpersonal relations were at best cold and at worst hostile.
The final progress of Elizabeth—the cultural processing of her age, in both senses of that term—was completed long after her funeral procession took place but begun some years before it, when her aging body first announced the proximity of her last days; it was enacted not in the streets of London or in the provinces but in the political unconscious, and to catch a glimpse of it we have to broaden our field of inquiry beyond the traditional resources of political history—journals and letters written before and after the queen's death, or the histories of Greville and Camden—and turn, among other places, to the Elizabethan and Jacobean stage.
It has often been remarked that the resurgent political misogyny of Elizabeth's court in the s coincided with a dramatic increase, as it were, of misogyny onstage; in the years after her death, as recent studies have also begun to detail, the popular stage manifested an acute and complex investment in the imaginary reworking and resolution of Elizabeth's reign.
For anyone concerned, as I am here, with the cultural construction of emotions and other forms of affect, the popular stage represents a unique historical resource, and one whose significance in its own time cannot be limited to the passive role of merely recording or reflecting early modern structures of feeling.
The symbolic economy of English culture by which I refer not just to official efforts to manage and maintain dominant systems of belief but to the entire repertoire of cultural representations and practices, official and unofficial, that shaped the political, social, and psychological subject and defined his or her place in the cultural hierarchy underwent a significant and radical transformation in the sixteenth century.
The English Reformation itself was hardly a tidy affair, marked as it was by the succession of no less than five official state religions, each claiming the status of unrivaled and absolute truth, and all within the space of a single generation; one of the results was to displace and destabilize the very notion of the orthodox or the absolute, producing a skeptical if not cynical relativism evident, in court records, even among the lower classes.
But contemporary fears of an increasingly informed and hence more autonomous subject were focused not only on those who could read, and with good reason; as Tessa Watt has recently reminded us, the boundary between oral and literate cultures in the period was highly permeable, such that ideas and ideologies were disseminated not only by direct and unmediated access to a printed text but also by diverse processes of re-presentation and representation, in official and unofficial forums ranging from the pulpit to the tavern.
The controversy provoked by the popular theater was largely ideological and political rather than aesthetic, and the reasons for this are relatively clear.
Public drama was not customarily graced with the status of literature or, less anachronistically, of poesy. More important, in an age when the domain in which knowledge was produced and circulated was still a relatively contained system, any significant expansion of that domain, any significant difference in the degree to which ideas and attitudes could be disseminated, threatened to become a difference in kind as well—to alter the structure of knowledge by redefining its boundaries, to force a transition from a relatively limited and closed symbolic system to a more radically open economy of knowledge and representation.
That the emerging institution in question was, at best, quasi-illicit only exacerbated the dilemma of its emergence. Combatted throughout its history by the city, licensed but hardly controlled by the court, the Elizabethan public theater emerged from and appropriated a place within the fissures and contradictions of the cultural landscape;15 although it rapidly became, in Jean Howard's words, "one of the chief ideological apparatuses of Elizabethan society,"16 it was neither the product nor the organ of the state but rather the result of a historically determined collusion between artisanal entrepreneurs and a socially diverse and astoundingly large audience.
And unlike other expansions of the discursive domain in the period, literacy was not the price of admission to the theater,17 a fact which gave the stage a currency and accessibility rivaled only by the pulpit, which it threatened to eclipse.Journal description.
For over thirty years, the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology has been presenting a professional eclectic approach to the respected tertiary field of. How Bereavement has Affected Jerzy The death of a spouse has to be one of the most stressful changes you will ever experience.
Your spouse was probably the most important person in your life, possibly for many years. First I will discuss how bereavement has affected Jerzy, whilst applying it to theory, then I will do the same for Helen. The death of a spouse has to be one of the . Loss takes many forms, from the bereavement of a loved one to the loss of a door key.
Loss can give rise to feelings ranging from deep mental anguish to feelings of annoyance. Grief or deep mental anguish rises from a great significant loss, a loss where an emotional attachment has been formed.
How Bereavement has Affected Jerzy The death of a spouse has to be one of the most stressful changes you will ever experience. Your spouse was probably the most important.
How Bereavement has Affected Jerzy Essay Words | 4 Pages. How Bereavement has Affected Jerzy The death of a spouse has to be one of the most stressful changes you will ever experience.
Your spouse was probably the most important person in your life, possibly for many years.