Social studies reviewer essay

Within the school program, social studies provides coordinated, systematic study drawing upon such disciplines as anthropology, archeology, economics, geography, history, law, philosophy, political science, psychology, religion, and sociology, as well as appropriate content from the humanities, mathematics, and neutral sciences. The primary purpose of social studies is to help young people develop the ability to make informed and reasoned decisions for the public good as citizens of a culturally diverse, democratic society in an interdependent world. There are two main characteristics of social studies as a field of study. First is social studies promoting civic competence, the knowledge, skill, and attitudes of a student needed to assume "the office of citizen" in our democratic republic.

Social studies reviewer essay

Areas of reliability[ edit ] Article instability and susceptibility to bias are two potential problem areas in a crowdsourced work like Wikipedia The reliability of Wikipedia articles can be measured by the following criteria: Accuracy of information provided within articles Appropriateness of the images provided with the article Appropriateness of the style and focus of the articles [26] Susceptibility to, and exclusion and removal of, false information Comprehensiveness, scope and coverage within articles and in the range of articles Identification of reputable third-party sources as citations Stability of the articles Susceptibility to editorial and systemic bias Quality of writing The first four of these have been the subjects of various studies of the project, while the presence of bias is strongly disputed, and the prevalence and quality of citations can be tested within Wikipedia.

Quality Content & Delivery

The most common criticisms were: Poor prose, or ease-of-reading issues 3 mentions Omissions or inaccuracies, often small but including key omissions in some articles 3 mentions Poor balance, with less important areas being given more attention and vice versa 1 mention The most common praises were: The articles were compared for accuracy by anonymous academic reviewers, a customary practice for journal article reviews.

Based on their reviews, on average the Wikipedia articles were described as containing 4 errors or omissions, while the Britannica articles contained 3. Only 4 serious errors were found in Wikipedia, and 4 in Britannica.

Wikipedia in fact had a third more inaccuracies than Britannica. He wrote that Wikipedia is "surprisingly accurate in reporting names, dates, and events in U. However, he stated that Wikipedia often fails to distinguish important from trivial details, and does not provide the best references.

A web-based survey conducted from December to May by Larry Press, a professor of Information Systems at California State University at Dominguez Hillsassessed the "accuracy and completeness of Wikipedia articles". The survey did not attempt random selection of the participants, and it is not clear how the participants were invited.

Experts evaluated 66 articles in various fields. In overall score, Wikipedia was rated 3. No errors were found, though there were significant omissions. In each case Wikipedia was described as "largely sound", "well handled", "performs well", "good for the bare facts" and "broadly accurate". One article had "a marked deterioration towards the end" while another had "clearer and more elegant" writing, a third was assessed as less well written but better detailed than its competitors, and a fourth was "of more benefit to the serious student than its Encarta or Britannica equivalents".

Social Studies Reviewer Essay Sample

No serious errors were noted in Wikipedia articles, whereas serious errors were noted in one Encarta and one Britannica article.

The magazine asked experts to evaluate articles pertaining to their field. A total of four articles were reviewed by three experts.

Wikipedia was comparable to the other encyclopedias, topping the chemistry category. The test was commissioned to a research institute Cologne-based WIND GmbHwhose analysts assessed 50 articles from each encyclopedia covering politics, business, sports, science, culture, entertainment, geography, medicine, history and religion on four criteria accuracy, completeness, timeliness and clarityand judged Wikipedia articles to be more accurate on the average 1.

It concluded, "The quality of content is good in all three cases" and advised Wikipedia users "Be aware that erroneous edits do occur, and check anything that seems outlandish with a second source.Nanomaterials, an international, peer-reviewed Open Access journal.

of the glorious moment when the student realizes he/she has succeeded with the problem and can move ahead with his/her studies independently. It is the "ah ha" moment for the student that gives me joy. Social innovation as a driver of social change • Social innovation constructed through legitimated social actions • The role of institutions enabling and constraining social action.

Nov 21,  · A good college student essay englishdaily junior english essays football match review essay peer.

Social studies reviewer essay

My first trip abroad essay writer My first trip abroad essay writer. Social studies 10 1 essays. 5 stars based on reviews heartoftexashop.com Essay» Read More. Social Studies Reviewer; Get Full Essay.

Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues. Get Access.

Maryellen B. | Tutor in Essay Writing and Social Studies | The Princeton Review

Social Studies Reviewer Essay Sample. Pointers: 1. Christianity. 2. Early inventions. 3. Asian Culture and Arts. 4. Asian family. Christianity. Fifty Orwell Essays, by George Orwell, free ebook.

Lyme Diagnosis Checklist - Do I Have Lyme?